MAPP01
Micro-placement

MQF Level: 7

ECTS Value: 10 ECTS

Self Study Hours: 50

Duration: 4 Sessions

Contact Hours: 10

Mode of Delivery: Online

Assessment Hours: 10

Supervised Placement and Practice Hours: 180

Home/EU/EEA Fees: €350
International Fee: €1,400

Entry Requirements

Applicants applying for the module are to be in possession of one of the following: 

a. A Bachelor’s degree in Education (MQF Level 6 with a minimum of 180 ECTS, or equivalent)  

OR 

b. A Bachelor’s degree (MQF Level 6 with a minimum of 180 ECTS, or equivalent) and PGCE (or equivalent) together with relevant experience in an educational setting; 

OR 

c. A Bachelor’s degree in Inclusive Education (MQF Level 6 with a minimum of 180 ECTS, or equivalent) together with 3 years’ relevant experience in an educational setting; 

OR 

d. A Master’s Degree (MQF Level 7 with a minimum of 90 ECTS, or equivalent) and a Permanent Teacher’s Warrant together with relevant experience in an educational setting

Overall Objectives and Outcomes

The aim of this module is to provide educators with a 6-week industry placement. Through the Micro-Placement experience, educators will analyse the skills and practices used in diverse professional settings beyond the traditional school and classroom environment. They will evaluate how these practices contribute to effective teaching and learning. Finally, educators will apply the knowledge gained by integrating these skills into their classroom instruction to enhance student learning experiences.

  • Apply different problem-solving strategies developed by working in an industry setting within their educational practice;
  • Formulate recommendations that enhance educational practice and curriculum design based on an analysis of workplace processes and challenges;
  • Bridge the gap between professional requirements in the different industries and classroom learning;
  • Evaluate the effectiveness of own professional competencies through inquiry-based reflection to ensure continuous professional development;
  • Collaborate with industry professionals to co-create learning experiences, incorporate industry knowledge, skills, and standards into educational curricula.
  • Contextually describe workplace learning theories such as activity theory and situated learning and their relevance to the professional practices in education;
  • Analyse the interconnection between industry requirements and educational outcomes;
  • Research methodologies for gathering and evaluating workplace data to address contextual problem in the industry and improve teaching practices;
  • Describe and differentiate problem solving techniques such as root cause analysis, design thinking and adaptive learning strategies;
  • Assess the validity and effectiveness of solution/s proposed within the industry and the educational context;
  • Critically evaluate factors that contribute for effective learning, including organizational culture, technological advancements, and collaboration dynamics.
  • Apply workplace-relevant problem-solving techniques to enhance industry-education collaboration;
  • Conduct root-cause analysis to identify key problems and challenges and propose effective, research-driven solutions.;
  • Propose valid, effective, and innovative educational solutions based on research and real-world industry insights;
  • Assess the feasibility of solution/s, ensuring relevance to both workplace challenges and classroom integration ;
  • Propose strategies to mitigate the identified risk factors associated with the problem being investigated.

This module will be assessed through: Logbook and Assignment.

Core Reading List

  1. Boud, D., Feletti, G. (2021). The Challenge of Problem-Based Learning (3rd ed.). Routledge.
  2. Huq, A. and Gilbert, D.H. (2017). “All the world’s a stage: Transforming entrepreneurship education through design thinking.” Education + Training, 59(2), 155-170.
  3. Jackson, D. and Bridgstock, R. (2020). “Evidencing student success in work-integrated learning: A capabilities approach.” Teaching in Higher Education, 25(6), 754-770.
  4. Kay, J., Ferns, S., Leoni, R., Smith, J. & Winchester-Seeto, T. (2019), “The emerging future: Innovative models of work-integrated learning”, International Journal of Work – Integrated Learning,  20(4), 401-413.
  5. Kay, J., Ferns, S., Russell, L., and Smith, J. (2022). “Innovative approaches to work-integrated learning: Insights from a global perspective.” Higher Education Research & Development, 41(5), 1208-1224.
  6. Savage, P. (2021). “A systematic review of problem-based learning in higher education.” Studies in Higher Education, 46(8), 1609-1629.

Supplementary Reading List

  1. Deming, D.J. (2017). “The growing importance of social skills in the labor market.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(4), 1593-1640.
  2. Dobson, H.E. and Bland Tomkinson, C. (2012). Creating sustainable development change agents through problem-based learning: Designing appropriate student PBL projects. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 13(3), 263-278.
  3. Kukkonen, S., Kärkkäinen, T., & Mäki, K. (2019). “Fostering lifelong learning skills through problem-based learning in higher education.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56(1), 3-13.
  4. Laxman, K. (2013). Infusing inquiry-based learning skills in curriculum implementation. International journal for lesson and learning studies, 2(1), 41 – 55.
  5. Moore, T., and Morton, J. (2017). “The myth of job readiness? Written communication, employability, and the ‘skills gap’ in higher education.” Studies in Higher Education, 42(3), 591-609.
  6. Silén, C. and Uhlin, L. (2022). “A learning approach for PBL: Establishing relationships among reflection, self-regulation, and learning activities.” Advances in Health Sciences Education, 27(2), 313-329.
 
Skip to content