MAPP22
Empowering Student Voice

MQF Level: 7

ECTS Value: 3 ECTS

Self Study Hours: 36

Duration: 6 Sessions

Contact Hours: 15

Mode of Delivery: Blended

Assessment Hours: 24

Entry Requirements

Applicants applying for the module are to be in possession of one of the following: 

a. A Bachelor’s degree in Education (MQF Level 6 with a minimum of 180 ECTS, or equivalent) together with relevant experience in an educational setting;  

OR 

b. A Bachelor’s degree (MQF Level 6 with a minimum of 180 ECTS, or equivalent) and PGCE (or equivalent) together with relevant experience in an educational setting; 

OR 

c. A Bachelor’s degree in Inclusive Education (MQF Level 6 with a minimum of 180 ECTS, or equivalent) together with 3 years’ relevant experience in an educational setting; 

OR 

d. A Master’s Degree (MQF Level 7 with a minimum of 90 ECTS, or equivalent) and a Permanent Teacher’s Warrant together with relevant experience in an educational setting

Overall Objectives and Outcomes

This module offers participants the opportunity to study ‘student voice,’ analysing its philosophical foundations and practical application in schools. It evokes a critical reflection on their own role in enabling student voice, whilst also facilitating a pragmatic understanding of how student voice can be elicited, promoted and given space in schools.

By the end of this module, the learner will be able to:

  • Implement participatory decision-making processes in the classroom, school, and broader educational community;
  • Carry out self-assessment and reflexive exercises to critically evaluate the level of power and influence within the different manifestations of student voice;
  • Design activities that foster student agency, encouraging learners to express their perspectives, ask questions, and shape their educational experience.
  • Describe the theoretical justification for empowering student voice in schools;
  • Critically evaluate the ideologies that gave birth to the concept of ‘student voice’: children’s rights, democracy in schools, citizenship education, person-centred education, radical education, transformative education, postmodernist formulations of power and school evaluation;
  • Highlight the key elements of Hart’s (1992) Ladder of Participation and the practical implications of his theory;
  • Consider the ethical dilemmas related to empowering student voice, including issues of consent, confidentiality, power dynamics, and cultural sensitivity.
  • Demonstrate an in-depth understanding of learner-centred pedagogical approaches and theories, including constructivism, inquiry-based learning, and cooperative learning, and their implications for empowering student voice in the classroom;
  • Foster effective communication and active listening skills which are essential to enable students to express their opinions, concerns, and ideas freely;
  • Analyse one’s positionality on the power balance between the self as an educator and the student;
  • Explore and apply different practical ways how to empower student voice, balancing institutional constraints with meaningful participation.

This module will be assessed through: Assignment; Presentation.

Core Reading List

  1. Brascof, M. Levitan, J., & Ground-water Smith, S. (2022). Student voice research: Theory, Methods, and innovations from the field. Teachers’ College Press.
  2. Orner, M. (2014). Interrupting the calls for student voice in “liberatory” education: A feminist poststructuralist perspective. In Feminisms and critical pedagogy(pp. 74-89). Routledge.
  3. Osler, A. (2010). Students’ perspectives on schooling. Open University Press.
  4. Quaglia, R .J., & Corso, M. J. (2014). Student voice: The instrument of change.

Supplementary Reading List

  1. Benner, M., Brown, C., & Jeffrey, A. (2019). Elevating student voice in education. CAP. https://www.americanprogress.org/article/elevating-student-voice-education/
  2. Chappell, S. (2021) Student Voice in School Improvement: A Principal in the Nuevo South Reflects on a Student-Centered Practitioner Inquiry. Educational Policy, 36(1), 208-219. https://doi.org/10.1177/08959048211059473
  3. Hart, R. A., (1992) Children’s participation: from tokenism to citizenship, UNICEF International Child Development Centre, Spedale degli Innocenti, Florence, Italy. http://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/childrens_participation.pdf
  4. Mayes, E., Finneran, R., & Black, R. (2019). The challenges of student voice in primary schools: Students ‘having a voice’ and
  5. ‘speaking for’ others. Australian Journal of Education, 63(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944119859445
  6. Mitra, D.(2018). Student voice in secondary schools: the possibility for deeper change. Journal of Education Administration. 56(5), 473-487. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-01-2018-0007
  7. National Council for Curriculum and Assessment. (2025). Student Voice. https://ncca.ie/en/about-ncca/collaborations-and-partnerships/student-voice/
  8. John, K., & Briel, L. (2017) Student voice: A growing movement within education that benefits students and teachers. Topical paper, Center on Transition Innovations. https://centerontransition.org/publications/download.cfm?id=61
 
Skip to content