Search

MMED100
The Media Literacy Educator

MQF Level: 7

ECTS Value: 5 ECTS

Self Study Hours: 60

Contact Hours: 25

Assessment Hours: 40

 

Overall Objectives and Outcomes

This module will start by looking at various definitions of Media Literacy Education, and critically analyse their underpinning assumptions and beliefs about the scope and aims of the subject. Then, it will look at the core principles of MLE, and delve into the meanings and implications of each one of them (NAMLE, 2007). Namely:

  • The need for active inquiry and critical thinking about the messages students receive and create.
  • The need to expand the concept of literacy (i.e., reading and writing) to include all forms of media.
  • The need to build and reinforce skills for learners of all ages. Like print literacy, those skills necessitate integrated, interactive, and repeated practice.
  • The need to develop informed, reflective, and engaged participants essential for a democratic society.
  • The need to recognize that media is a part of culture and functions as agent of socialization,
  • The need to affirm that people use their individual skills, beliefs, and experiences to construct their own meanings from media messages.

It will also show how these core principles are incorporated into the broad learning outcomes of the MLE syllabus.

It will also show how these core principles are incorporated into the broad learning outcomes of the MLE syllabus.

To achieve this aim, a brief outline of the syllabus will be presented. The module will resume with:

  • listing the qualities of the Media Literacy Educator, and elaborating on the skills and competences that each quality is related to;
  • an explanation of how the VET system works, the educational philosophy that underpins it, and the system’s pedagogical implications, AND
  • the importance of constructive alignment between content, pedagogy, and assessment, within the VET system.

By the end of this programme, participants should be able to:

Competences

a. Advise the SMT through research-based strategies on the importance of MLE in the school curriculum;

b. Collaborate with the SMT to implement a cross-curricular approach regarding MLE, in a variety of modes;

c. Guide students to understand and appreciate the true value of MLE and its aims and objectives, especially in making them more creative and responsible digital citizens, who can contribute to their community and society in general;

d. Ensure that all students have opportunities to learn the basic knowledge, skills, and competences of MLE, so that they feel empowered to access all media and create their own multimodal productions responsibly, experiencing maturation of their identity in the process;

e. Create the appropriate learning environment, through the right pedagogies, that makes it possible for students to access, analyze, evaluate, & create media in a variety of forms;

f. Formulate research-based strategies, policies and practical suggestions and initiatives to SLT Members, that aim at the improvement of MLE in the school, both as a curricular VET subject, and as a cross-curricular theme;

g. Monitor the learning environment and its conduciveness to MLE, after consultation with experts in the subject, in order to provide constructive feedback and make appropriate proposals to SLT;

h. Supervise and mentor other newly qualified MLE teachers, and provide them with the necessary support they would need, including research-based training on specific aspects of the curricular subject.


Knowledge 

a. Define Media Literacy Education;

b. Define and distinguish between media texts, media genres, media forms and media platforms.

c. Tell the history of MLE in Malta and its contribution to local education;

d. List and describe the core principles and main aims of MLE;

e. Describe each principle and aim;

f. Describe the underlying assumptions and pedagogical implications of the core principles and main aims of MLE;

g. Describe the VET system and its pedagogical implications;

h. Define constructive alignment between content, pedagogy and assessment;

i. List the qualities that every MLE educator must invest in through professional development initiatives;

j. Describe each of these qualities;

k. Understand how the VET system works, and what constuctive alignment is & how it is implemented in the pedagogical design;

l. Discuss what constitutes constructive alignment to schemes of work and lesson plans on specific MLE topics;

m. Demonstrate how the constructive alignment between content, pedagogy and assessment of MLE can be implemented effectively.


Skills

a. Apply constructive alignment to schemes of work and lesson plans on specific MLE topics;

b. Demonstrate how constructive alignment can be applied in the MLE classroom, through specific examples;

c. Show how the pedagigcal implications of the aims and principles of MLE can increase the effectiveness of the constructive alignment between content, pedagogy and assessment;

d. Demonstrate how the qualities of the MLE educator could be utilized in specific situations, and to address specific learning outcomes, through case-studies;

e. Apply the qualities that every MLE educator must invest in through professional development initiatives (these should be aligned with the basic aims and principles of MLE), through short presentations of one’s work in the classroom;

f. Prepare and share short critical reflections on the pedagogical skills practiced in class, and those that are still identified as lacking;

g. Design research-based lesson plans and schemes of work that show constructive alignment, and how they can incorporate effectively various media texts, media genres, media forms and media platforms to increase the subject’s relevance;

h. Prepare self-critical self-evaluations on presentations delivered in the classroom;

i. Present concrete examples related to specific aspects of MLE, like news and advert literacy, through effective pedagogical techniques that are reflected upon through experience and sifted through research;

j. Examine, through research, reflexivity and critical discussion, how the qualities of the MLE educator could be utilized in specific situations;

k. Illustrate how to address specific learning outcomes, through case-studies and relevant scenarios, that could be utilized in assignment briefs.

Assessment Methods

This module will be assessed through: Individual Assignment, Group Assignment, Group Presentation and Online Fora.

Suggested Readings

Core Reading List
  1. Buckingham D. (2015b). ‘Do We Really Need Media Education 2.0? Teaching Media in the Age of Participatory Culture’. In: Lin TB., Chen V., Chai C. (eds.) New Media and Learning in the 21st Century. Education Innovation Series. Singapore: Springer.
  2. W, Baker Frank. Mastering media literacy. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press, a division of Solution Tree, 2014.
  3. McDougall, J., Zezulkova, M. & Sternadel, D. (2018). Teaching media literacy in Europe: evidence of effective school practices in primary and secondary education. NESET Analytical Report (This document has been prepared for the European Commission; however, it reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  4. Scheibe, C. & Rogow, F. (2011). The Teacher’s Guide to Media Literacy: Critical Thinking in a Multimedia World. Corwin Publishers.
  5. SEC 41 Syllabus Media Literacy 2023. (Updated on 14th April, 2021). University of Malta.
Supplementary Reading List
  1. Look at the REFERENCES list of the NESET Analytical Report cited in above section. Could be accessed at: https://nesetweb.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/AR2_Full_Report_With_identifiers_Teaching-Media-Literacy.pdf
  2. Silverblatt, A., Ferry, J. & Finan, B. (2009). Approaches to Media Literacy: A Handbook (2nd edition). Routledge: Taylor and Francis, NY.
  3. Hobbs, Renee. “Media Literacy.” In The Routledge International Handbook of Children, Adolescents, and Media, 475–82. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003118824-60.
  4. Cohen, James, and Thomas Kenny. “Web Literacy.” In Producing New and Digital Media, 71–103. Second edition. | London ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2020.: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429201226-3.
  5. Spengler, Stephen. “Educators’ Perceptions of a 21st Century Digital Literacy Framework.” ScholarWorks, 2015. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/556.
Skip to content